An aesthetic and poetic consideration of the beauty of the female form.
I can't tell who's in picture 4, but I do believe she's "nekkid" under there!
We'd all like to believe that--I did myself. But through tireless research (i.e. trying to find a more "revelatory" picture), I found that Natasha Richardson is actually wearing a flesh-colored thong under there.
Which is better (or worse) - a flesh-colored thong or thong-colored flesh?!
I've never been good at resolving these, but . . . I think most existential dilemmas are soluble with: it amounts to the same thing.
Post a Comment
4 comments:
I can't tell who's in picture 4, but I do believe she's "nekkid" under there!
We'd all like to believe that--I did myself. But through tireless research (i.e. trying to find a more "revelatory" picture), I found that Natasha Richardson is actually wearing a flesh-colored thong under there.
Which is better (or worse) - a flesh-colored thong or thong-colored flesh?!
I've never been good at resolving these, but . . . I think most existential dilemmas are soluble with: it amounts to the same thing.
Post a Comment